Significant Lithium Discovery at Red Mountain Project
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
18 June 2024
SIGNIFICANT LITHIUM DISCOVERY IN INAUGURAL DRILL
CAMPAIGN AT RED MOUNTAIN PROJECT, USA
Assays from first three holes intersect high-grade lithium mineralisation
Key Highlights
•
High-grade lithium clay mineralisation discovered at
Red Mountain Project in Nevada, with the first three
holes of the maiden drill campaign all returning highgrade results.
•
RMRC001 : 59.4m @ 1,300ppm Li from 73.2m.
•
RMRC002 : 15.2m @ 810ppm Li from 15.2m.
•
RMRC003 : 6.10m @ 1,050ppm Li from surface and 12.2m
@ 1,060ppm Li from 18.3m
•
Intersections span over 4.6km of strike at the Project.
•
Maiden drill campaign now complete, with a total of 11 holes
drilled for a combined 1,518m
•
Assay results for the remaining eight drill holes expected by
the end of July.
Astute Metals NL (ASX: ASE) (“ASE”, “Astute” or “the Company”) is pleased to advise that assays results
from the first three holes of the maiden RC drilling campaign at its 100%-owned Red Mountain Lithium
Project in Nevada, USA have returned high-grade mineralisation, indicating the potential discovery of a
significant lithium deposit.
The assay results included the following high-grade drill intersections:
•
RMRC001 : 59.4m @ 1,300ppm Li / 0.69% Lithium Carbonate Equivalent1 (LCE) from 73.2m
•
RMRC002 : 15.2m @ 810ppm Li / 0.43% LCE from 15.2m
•
RMRC003 : 6.1m @ 1,050ppm Li / 0.56% LCE from surface, and
12.2m @ 1,060ppm Li / 0.56% LCE from 18.3m
A total of 11 holes were drilled for a combined 1,518m as part of the maiden RC drilling campaign, which
targeted lithium clay mineralisation in zones of strong soil anomalism and/or rock chip anomalism with
a view to understanding the thickness and grade potential of the project (Table 1 and Figure 1).
These initial results have confirmed the anticipated discovery of sub-surface lithium mineralisation at
Red Mountain, which has clear potential to emerge as a significant project in the context of North
American exploration efforts for battery metals.
Once assays for the remaining drill holes have been received by the Company, results will be collated
and interpreted in order to guide the next steps for exploration at the project, which is now expected to
include a follow-up drilling campaign in the second half of the calendar year. The remaining assays are
expected to be received in two batches in early and late July.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
Astute Chairman, Tony Leibowitz, said:
“This is a very exciting start to our drilling campaign at Red Mountain, with all three of our initial drill
holes intersecting high-grade lithium mineralisation. The results have been returned over 4.6km of
strike, indicating the potential for a major new discovery.
We are now eagerly awaiting the results from the remaining eight holes, which are expected to be
received in July, with assays from all holes to be integrated into an updated geological model for
Red Mountain with a view of expediting the process to achieving a maiden resource for our Red
Mountain Project.”
Figure 1. Drill-hole locations and intersections, and gridded soil sample geochemistry over aerial image.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
About Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE)
Unlike spodumene concentrate, which is a feedstock for a value-added battery product, Lithium
Carbonate is a principal lithium-ion battery product, which may be used directly in battery production
or converted to other battery products such as lithium hydroxide. The Benchmark Mineral Intelligence
Lithium Carbonate China Index priced lithium carbonate product at US$13,710/t6 as of 12 June 2024.
Lithium carbonate is the product of many of the most advanced lithium clay projects around the world,
including Lithium Americas’ (NYSE: LAC) 16.1Mt LCE Thacker Pass Project 3 which is currently under
construction. Accordingly, exploration results for Red Mountain have been reported as both the standard
parts-per-million (ppm) and as % Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE). A full table of tabulated assay
results is provided in Appendix 2.
Easting
Northing
RL
Dip
Azimuth
Depth Drilled
(NAD83)
(NAD83)
(m)
(°)
(°)
(m)
RMRC001
637610
4285589
1708
-50
180
182.9
RMRC002
637105
4290201
1694
-50
270
128.0
RMRC003
637105
4290201
1694
-90
-
36.6
RMRC004
637782
4288743
1709
-50
270
137.2
RMRC005
637321
4288194
1687
-50
270
137.2
RMRC006
637534
4288197
1696
-50
270
182.9
RMRC007
637100
4287805
1672
-50
270
152.4
RMRC008
637676
4286218
1709
-50
270
152.4
RMRC009
637667
4285795
1704
-50
270
152.4
RMRC010
636942
4285791
1680
-50
270
121.9
RMRC011
636423
4286202
1650
-50
270
134.1
Drill Hole ID
Table 1. Drill hole collar details
Background
Located in central-eastern Nevada (Figure 2), the Red Mountain Project was staked by Astute in August
2023.
The Project area has broad mapped tertiary lacustrine (lake) sedimentary rocks known locally as the
Horse Camp Formation2. Elsewhere in the state of Nevada, equivalent rocks host large lithium deposits
(see Figure 2) such as Lithium Americas’ (NYSE: LAC) 16.1Mt LCE Thacker Pass Project3, American Battery
Technology Corporation’s (OTCMKTS: ABML) 15.8Mt LCE Tonopah Flats deposit4 and American Lithium
(TSX.V: LI) 9.79Mt LCE TLC Lithium Project5.
After staking was completed, Astute completed an 819-point soil sampling campaign that revealed
strong lithium anomalism in soils, with grades of up to 1,110ppm lithium and a coherent 50ppm+ anomaly
that stretched over 8km strike and up to 2.8km width 2 (Figure 1).
After completing the soil sampling campaign, the Company embarked on a rock-chip campaign at Red
Mountain designed to test for lithium at strategic locations and across a range of outcropping and
shallowly sub-cropping rock types.
The results of the rock chip sampling revealed the presence of strongly mineralised claystone, with 10
claystones grading on average 1,102ppm lithium, ranging from 132-2,190ppm lithium2. As a relatively soft
rock type, the claystones at Red Mountain are ‘recessive’, or lie beneath a typically thin veneer of alluvium.
This recessive nature of the claystone means that more claystone may be present than is immediately
apparent, with the harder rock types presenting as outcrop and the claystone being hidden.
Other attractive Project characteristics include outcropping claystone host-rocks and close proximity to
infrastructure, including the Project being immediately adjacent to the Grand Army of the Republic
Highway (Route 6), which links the regional cities of Ely with Tonopah.
Next Steps
The Company is awaiting outstanding assay results for the remaining eight drill holes completed as part
of the maiden drill campaign at Red Mountain. Once received, a full interpretation will be conducted
ahead of establishing detailed future plans for the Project.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
Figure 2. Location of Astute Lithium Projects, and Nevada lithium deposits.
1 Lithium Carbonate Equivalent wt%(LCE) has been calculated from Lithium parts-per-million (ppm) by the formula LCE = Li (ppm) x 5.323 /10,000
2 ASX: ASE 27 November 2023 ‘Outstanding Rock-Chip Assays at Red Mountain Project’
3 NYSE: LAC 2 November 2022 Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Thacker Pass Project
4 OTCMKTS: ABML 26 February 2023 ‘Technical Report Summary for The Tonopah Flats Lithium Project, Esmeralda.’
5 TSX.V: LI 17 March 2023 ‘Tonopah Lithium Claims project NI 43-101 technical report – Preliminary Economic Assessment’
6 Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence – Lithium Carbonate China Index 12/06/2024
Authorisation
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Astute.
More Information
Matt Healy
Executive Director
mhealy@astutemetals.com
+61 (0) 431 683 952
Nicholas Read
Media & Investor Relations
nicholas@readcorporate.com.au
+61 (0) 419 929 046
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
Competent Persons
The information in this report that relates to Sampling Techniques and Data (Section 1) is based on
information compiled by Mr. Matthew Healy, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM Member number 303597). Mr. Healy is a full-time employee
of Astute Metals NL and is eligible to participate in a Loan Funded Share incentive plan of the Company.
Mr. Healy has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the
2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves’. Mr. Healy consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the
form and context in which it appears.
The information in this report that relates to Reporting of Exploration Results (Section 2) is based on
information compiled by Mr. Richard Newport, principal partner of Richard Newport & Associates –
Consultant Geoscientists. Mr. Newport is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has
sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person under the
2012 Edition of the ’Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves‘. Mr. Newport consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his
information in the form and context in which it appears.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1 - Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialisedindustry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheldXRF instruments, etc.).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
5.5” reverse circulation drilling was undertaken
for drill sample collection. Samples were
collected on a 5-foot basis in calico bags,
with a 50% split retained from a rotary cone
splitter for lab assay.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensuresample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
Samples were air dried on elevated grid mesh
until practical to transport
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation thatare Material to the Public
Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
been done this would be relatively simple
(e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay’). In other cases, more explanation
may be required, suchas where there is
coarse gold that has inherentsampling
problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Nominal small drill sample was collected for chip
tray records
Claystone hosted lithium deposits are thought to
form as a result of the weathering of
lithium-bearing volcanic glass within
tertiary-aged tuffaceous lacustrine sediments of
the mapped Ts3 unit. Inputs of lithium from
geothermal sources have also been proposed.
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, openholehammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter,
triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails,
face-sampling bit or other type, whether core
isoriented and if so, by what method, etc.).
5.5” reverse circulation drilling methods
employed. Water was injected to assist with
transport of sample from bit to surface, as required.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core
andchip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
Sample recovery established by dry sample
weights undertaken by independent
laboratory prior to sample preparation and
analysis
Measures taken to maximise sample
recoveryand ensure representative nature
of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gainof fine/coarse material.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to alevel of detail to support
appropriate MineralResource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative innature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc.) photography.
Some instances of poor recovery near surface.
Instances of poor recovery are not expected
tomaterially impact interpretation of results
Drill cuttings for entire hole logged for lithology by
company geologists
Logging is qualitative
Photography of material intersections of
claystone taken of relevant chip trays
The total length and percentage of the
relevantintersections logged.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Subsampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
Samples, 50% split using a rotary cone splitter,
were submitted to ALS Laboratories in Elko for
preparation and analysis.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotarysplit, etc. and whether sampled wet or
dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparationtechnique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivityof samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
isrepresentative of the in-situ material
collected,including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
thegrain size of the material being sampled.
The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is
considered partial ortotal.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheldXRF instruments, etc., the
parameters used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of
bias) and precisionhave been established.
Verification
of sampling
and
assaying
Assay quality was monitored using pulp blanks,
as well as certified reference materials (CRMs)
at a range of lithium grades. Pulp blank results
indicated no material contamination of
samples from sample preparation or during the
analytical process. CRM results were within 3
standard deviations of certified values. No
material systematic bias nor other accuracy
related issues were identified.
The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
Sample intervals to be assigned a unique
sample identification number prior to sample
despatch
The use of twinned holes.
Lithium-mineralised claystone Certified
Reference Materials (standards), pulp
blanks and coarse blanks to be inserted into
the sample stream at regular intervals to
monitor lab accuracy and potential
contamination during sample prep and
analytical processes
Documentation of primary data, data
entryprocedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of
data points
Samples analysed by method ME-MS41 which is
an ICP-MS method employing an aqua-regia
digest. Aqua-regia is not considered a ‘total’
digest for many elements however is
considered fit for purpose for lithium and has
been used extensively by other parties
exploring for lithium claystone deposits in the
USA.
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locatedrill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Drill collar locations determined using handheld GPS with location reported in NAD83 UTM
Zone 11. Expected hole location accuracy of +/10m
No downhole surveys conducted on drill holes,
with drill rigs lined up by compass and clino
at start of hole
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Data
spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Drill spacing is appropriate for early exploration
purposes
Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological
and grade continuity appropriate for the
MineralResource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.
5-foot sample interval widely adopted as
standard practice in air drilling in the USA.
Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased sampling of possible structures and
the extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
Claystone beds are regionally shallow-dipping at
~20° to the east although locally this may vary
across the Project with some evidence of faulting
and potential folding
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample security.
Samples stored at secured yard and shed located
in township of Currant until delivered by staff or
contractors to the ALS lab at Elko, NV
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of
samplingtechniques and data.
Not applicable
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 2 - Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Mineral
tenement
and land
tenure status
Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
Red Mountain Claims held in 100% Astute
subsidiary Needles Holdings Inc.
The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration
done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
byother parties.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
Claims located on Federal (BLM) Land
Drilling conducted on claims certified by the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
No known previous lithium exploration
conducted at Red Mountain
Exploration conducted elsewhere in Nevada by
other explorers referenced in announcement
body text
The principal target deposit style is claystone
hosted lithium mineralisation. Claystone hosted
lithium deposits are thought to form as a result of
the weathering of lithium-bearing volcanic glass
within tertiary-aged tuffaceous lacustrine
sediments of the mapped Ts3 unit.
Lacustrine environments formed as a result of
extensional tectonic regime that produced ‘basin
and range’ topography observed across the
stateof Nevada. Inputs of lithium from
geothermal sources have also been proposed.
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results
including a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes:
◦ easting and northing of the drill hole collar
◦ elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
◦ dip and azimuth of the hole
◦ down hole length and interception depth
◦ hole length.
Drillhole locations, orientations and drilled
depths are tabulated in body report
If the exclusion of this information is justified on
the basis that the information is not Material and
this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent
Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data
aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.
Intersections, where quoted are weighted by
length.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths
of low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some
typical examples of such aggregations should
be shownin detail.
Low grade mineralisation (300-500ppm Li) is
present outside of the quoted intersections
A 500ppm Li cut-off was used to quote
headline intersections, with allowance for 5ft of
internal dilution by lower grade material.
Intersections are quoted in both lithium ppm and
as wt% Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE). LCE is
calculated as LCE = Li (ppm) x 5.323 / 10,000, as
per industry conventions.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly important in
the reporting of Exploration Results.
Insufficient information available due to early
exploration status
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect
to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should
be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths
are reported, there should be a clear statement
to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width
notknown’).
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)
andtabulations of intercepts should be included
for any significant discovery being reported
These should include, but not be limited to a plan
view of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Included in ASX announcement
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration
Results is not practicable, representative
reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.
This release describes all relevant information
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observations;
geophysicalsurvey results; geochemical survey
results; bulk samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
This release describes all relevant information
Further work
The nature and scale of planned further work
(e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth
extensions orlarge-scale step-out drilling).
Drill results demonstrate further work at the Red
Mountain project is most likely warranted,
however this will be subject to receipt of the
remaining 8-holes worth of assay results
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
APPENDIX 2 – Red Mountain Drilling
Sample Assay Table
From
Hole ID
(ft)
To (ft)
Li
LCE
(ppm)
(%)
Hole ID
From
(ft)
To (ft)
Li
LCE
(ppm)
(%)
RMRC001
30
35
9.8
0.01
RMRC001
255
260
1960
1.04
RMRC001
35
40
18.2
0.01
RMRC001
260
265
1790
0.95
RMRC001
40
45
130
0.07
RMRC001
265
270
1455
0.77
RMRC001
45
50
325
0.17
RMRC001
270
275
876
0.47
RMRC001
50
55
301
0.16
RMRC001
275
280
870
0.46
RMRC001
55
60
320
0.17
RMRC001
280
285
1065
0.57
RMRC001
60
65
369
0.20
RMRC001
285
290
1585
0.84
RMRC001
65
70
426
0.23
RMRC001
290
295
898
0.48
RMRC001
70
75
457
0.24
RMRC001
295
300
2560
1.36
RMRC001
75
80
858
0.46
RMRC001
300
305
1105
0.59
RMRC001
80
85
408
0.22
RMRC001
305
310
936
0.50
RMRC001
85
90
259
0.14
RMRC001
310
315
936
0.50
RMRC001
90
95
306
0.16
RMRC001
315
320
867
0.46
RMRC001
95
100
244
0.13
RMRC001
320
325
1010
0.54
RMRC001
100
105
274
0.15
RMRC001
325
330
864
0.46
RMRC001
105
110
211
0.11
RMRC001
330
335
1000
0.53
RMRC001
110
115
212
0.11
RMRC001
335
340
1495
0.80
RMRC001
115
120
226
0.12
RMRC001
340
345
1510
0.80
RMRC001
120
125
255
0.14
RMRC001
345
350
1615
0.86
RMRC001
125
130
270
0.14
RMRC001
350
355
1740
0.93
RMRC001
130
135
288
0.15
RMRC001
355
360
1565
0.83
RMRC001
135
140
324
0.17
RMRC001
360
365
1525
0.81
RMRC001
140
145
271
0.14
RMRC001
365
370
1680
0.89
RMRC001
145
150
137.5
0.07
RMRC001
370
375
1290
0.69
RMRC001
150
155
285
0.15
RMRC001
375
380
1540
0.82
RMRC001
155
160
680
0.36
RMRC001
380
385
1460
0.78
RMRC001
160
165
468
0.25
RMRC001
385
390
1565
0.83
RMRC001
165
170
267
0.14
RMRC001
390
395
1280
0.68
RMRC001
170
175
129.5
0.07
RMRC001
395
400
1380
0.73
RMRC001
175
180
107.5
0.06
RMRC001
400
405
998
0.53
RMRC001
180
185
211
0.11
RMRC001
405
410
561
0.30
RMRC001
185
190
160
0.09
RMRC001
410
415
1240
0.66
RMRC001
190
195
134.5
0.07
RMRC001
415
420
1105
0.59
RMRC001
195
200
170.5
0.09
RMRC001
420
425
1380
0.73
RMRC001
200
205
170.5
0.09
RMRC001
425
430
383
0.20
RMRC001
205
210
151
0.08
RMRC001
430
435
803
0.43
RMRC001
210
215
172.5
0.09
RMRC001
435
440
446
0.24
RMRC001
215
220
237
0.13
RMRC001
440
445
246
0.13
RMRC001
220
225
206
0.11
RMRC001
445
450
141
0.08
RMRC001
225
230
258
0.14
RMRC001
450
455
259
0.14
RMRC001
230
235
308
0.16
RMRC001
455
460
186
0.10
RMRC001
235
240
430
0.23
RMRC001
460
465
95.7
0.05
RMRC001
240
245
1340
0.71
RMRC001
465
470
95.9
0.05
RMRC001
245
250
1895
1.01
RMRC001
470
475
227
0.12
RMRC001
250
255
1400
0.75
RMRC001
475
480
131.5
0.07
Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001
+61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com
www.astutemetals.com
APPENDIX 2 – Red Mountain Drilling
Sample Assay Table
From
Hole ID
(ft)
To (ft)
Li
LCE
(ppm)
(%)
Hole ID
From
(ft)
To (ft)
Li
LCE
(ppm)
(%)
RMRC001
480
485
101.5
0.05
RMRC002
105
110
242
0.13
RMRC001
485
490
92.3
0.05
RMRC002
110
115
153
0.08
RMRC001
490
495
236
0.13
RMRC002
115
120
157.5
0.08
RMRC001
495
500
133
0.07
RMRC002
120
125
138
0.07
RMRC001
500
505
60.9
0.03
RMRC002
125
130
81
0.04
RMRC001
505
510
47.9
0.03
RMRC002
130
135
97
0.05
RMRC001
510
515
119
0.06
RMRC002
135
140
113.5
0.06
RMRC001
515
520
93.1
0.05
RMRC002
140
145
205
0.11
RMRC001
520
525
85.7
0.05
RMRC002
145
150
285
0.15
RMRC001
525
530
100
0.05
RMRC002
150
155
281
0.15
RMRC001
530
535
185
0.10
RMRC002
155
160
152
0.08
RMRC001
535
540
149
0.08
RMRC002
160
165
368
0.20
RMRC001
540
545
140
0.07
RMRC002
165
170
482
0.26
RMRC001
545
550
146.5
0.08
RMRC002
170
175
263
0.14
RMRC001
550
555
259
0.14
RMRC002
175
180
179.5
0.10
RMRC001
555
560
322
0.17
RMRC002
180
185
259
0.14
RMRC001
560
565
280
0.15
RMRC002
185
190
200
0.11
RMRC001
565
570
369
0.20
RMRC002
190
195
231
0.12
RMRC001
570
575
294
0.16
RMRC002
195
200
274
0.15
RMRC001
575
580
199
0.11
RMRC002
200
205
197
0.10
RMRC001
580
585
281
0.15
RMRC002
205
210
171
0.09
RMRC001
585
590
272
0.14
RMRC002
210
215
206
0.11
RMRC001
590
595
295
0.16
RMRC002
215
220
295
0.16
RMRC001
595
600
338
0.18
RMRC002
220
225
390
0.21
RMRC002
0
5
420
0.22
RMRC002
225
230
393
0.21
RMRC002
5
10
1835
0.98
RMRC002
230
235
638
0.34
RMRC002
10
15
254
0.14
RMRC002
235
240
536
0.29
RMRC002
15
20
52.4
0.03
RMRC002
240
245
454
0.24
RMRC002
20
25
344
0.18
RMRC002
245
250
374
0.20
RMRC002
25
30
347
0.18
RMRC002
250
255
496
0.26
RMRC002
30
35
213
0.11
RMRC002
255
260
327
0.17
RMRC002
35
40
532
0.28
RMRC002
260
265
246
0.13
RMRC002
40
45
185.5
0.10
RMRC002
265
270
325
0.17
RMRC002
45
50
104
0.06
RMRC002
270
275
465
0.25
RMRC002
50
55
895
0.48
RMRC002
275
280
479
0.25
RMRC002
55
60
714
0.38
Share your feedback
Discover