Announcement PDF 12 January 2024 MORE LITHIUM-BEARING CLAYS INTERSECTED AT ALTAIR LITHIUM PROJECT, USA Lithium claystone mineralisation now confirmed over 1.9km of strike Key Highlights • Follow-up drill-hole AL03 intersected 13.7m (45ft) @ 365ppm Li from 163m (535ft) to end-of-hole. • The intersection in AL03 confirms that the mineralised Siebert Formation claystone extends over 1.9km of strike. • Hole ended in lithium mineralisation, indicating further potential beyond the hole depth (176.8m/580ft). • Drill-hole AL02 intersected anomalous lithium over 100ppm in four 1.5m zones, with a peak assay of 148.5ppm. • The lithium mineralisation at Altair remains open to the north, west and at depth around holes AL01 and AL03, highlighting continued exploration potential. Astute Metals NL (ASX: ASE) (“ASE”, “Astute” or “the Company”) is pleased to advise that it has intersected further lithium mineralisation in recent follow-up drilling at its highly prospective 100%-owned Altair Lithium Project in Nevada, USA. Drill-hole AL03 intersected: • 13.7m @ 365ppm Li from 163m (535ft) to End-Of-Hole (176.8m/580ft). This result has confirmed an extension of the mineralised Siebert Formation claystone 1.9km to the east of the initial discovery hole AL01, which intersected two previously announced significant zones of lithium mineralisation3, namely: • • 33.5m @ 481ppm Li from 80.8m (265ft); and 33.5m @ 508ppm Li from 147.8m (485ft) to End-of-Hole (181.4m/595ft). In addition, hole AL02, which was drilled at the eastern extent of the Altair Project approximately 5.4km east of AL03, intersected four zones of anomalous lithium-in-clays where lithium values peak over 100ppm. It is unclear at this early stage whether the intercalated claystone and fine gravels at this hole belong to the Siebert Formation or are part of younger, Quaternary-aged sequences. However, the fact that the clays are lithium-bearing suggests the potential for higher grades nearby if they do belong to the Siebert Formation. A full table of assay results is provided in Appendix 3. To continue building on the exploration success achieved to date at Altair, the Company intends to permit additional holes to test for further intersections of lithium claystone to the north and west of the Altair Project in H1 of 2024, with further drilling planned in H2. Astute Executive Chairman, Tony Leibowitz, said: “These very encouraging results from Holes 2 and 3 wrap-up what was an extremely successful first year of drilling for Astute at Altair. The significant intercept in Hole 3 confirms that the mineralized Siebert Formation horizon extends over a strike length of 1.9km, building on previously reported drilling. We have lots of unfinished business at Altair and we plan to permit additional holes there while we progress exploration activities at the exciting new Red Mountain Project.” Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com Background Centred south-west of the township of Tonopah, in the heart of one of the world’s most active lithium exploration districts, the Altair Project was strategically staked proximal to outcropping tertiary sedimentary host rock (known locally as the Siebert Formation) that is known to host claystone lithium deposits around Nevada. Such deposits include the 15.8Mt LCE (lithium carbonate equivalent) Tonopah Flats deposit1 and the 9.79Mt LCE TLC Lithium Project2 (Figure 4). The Company completed the first hole at Altair in Q3 2023, with drill-hole AL01 successfully intersecting two zones of lithium mineralisation: • • 33.5m @ 481ppm Li from 80.8m (265ft); and 33.5m @ 508ppm Li from 147.8m (485ft) to End-of-Hole (181.4m/595ft). The Company re-commenced drilling at Altair in November 2023 with a higher-powered Reverse Circulation (RC) drill rig more appropriate to contend with the challenging drilling conditions encountered previously at the Project (Figure 1). Two holes were drilled at Altair for a combined 312.4m (1,025ft), successfully intersecting claystone in both holes AL03 and AL024. Figure 1. Drill rig set up at site AL03. Interpretation There is strong similarity between the soft blue-green nature and lithium grade of the clays intersected in AL01 and AL03, indicating that the clays intersected in AL03 are an extension of the Siebert Formation encountered in hole AL01. The deepening of the claystone intersected in AL03 is interpreted to potentially be due to a paleochannel where Siebert Formation clays may have been eroded away and fine gravels deposited in place (see Schematic Section in Figure 2) Given the variation in depth of intersection, thickness and grade of the claystones between the easternmost hole AL02 and those in AL01 and AL03, it remains unclear if the claystones intersected in AL02 belong to the Siebert Formation and this will only be resolved with additional drilling. Based on the drilling to date, the mineralisation remains open to the west and the north of the project, with excellent potential to expand the extent of lithium-bearing clays. In addition, the mineralisation also remains open, to an unknown degree, between AL03 and AL02 (Figure 3). Next Steps The Company will work to permit additional holes in the west and north of the project, and between holes AL03 and AL02. Permitting is expected to be completed in H1 of 2024, allowing further drilling to take place in the second half of 2024. Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com Figure 2. Schematic Cross-Section showing AL01 lithium geochemistry and summary logging for all three holes. Figure 3. Altair Project drill-hole location plan and arrows indicating lithium clay extension potential. Hole ID Easting Northing Dip Depth AL01 470859 4189179 -90° 181.4m (595ft) AL02 478236 4188869 -90° 135.6m (445ft) AL03 472767 4189133 -90° 176.8m (580ft) Table 1. Drill collar locations Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com Figure 4. Location of Polaris and Altair Projects, lithium deposits and exploration projects. 1 OTCMKTS: ABML 26 February 2023 ‘Technical Report Summary For The Tonopah Flats Lithium Project, Esmeralda..’ 2 TSX.V: LI 17 March 2023 ‘Tonopah Lithium Claims project NI 43-101 technical report – Preliminary Economic Assessment’ 3 ASX: ASE 23 August 2023 ‘Broad lithium hits in first Altair drillhole’ 4 ASX: ASE 23 November 2023 ‘More Claystone Intersected at Altair Project’ Authorisation This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Astute. More Information Matt Healy General Manager – Exploration mhealy@astutemetals.com +61 (0) 431 683 952 Nicholas Read Media & Investor Relations nicholas@readcorporate.com.au +61 (0) 419 929 046 Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com Competent Persons The information in this report that relates to Sampling Techniques and Data (Section 1) is based on information compiled by Mr Matthew Healy, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM Member number 303597). Mr Healy is a full-time employee of Astute Metals NL and is eligible to participate in a Loan Funded Share incentive plan of the Company. Mr Healy has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Healy consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The information in this report that relates to Reporting of Exploration Results (Section 2) is based on information compiled by Mr Richard Newport, principal partner of Richard Newport & Associates – Consultant Geoscientists. Mr Newport is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person under the 2012 Edition of the ’Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves‘. Mr. Newport consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Section 1 - Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialisedindustry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheldXRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. 5.5” reverse circulation and 5.25” tricone drilling was undertaken for drill sample collection. Samples were collected on a 5-foot basis in calico bags, with a 50% split retained from a rotary cone splitter for lab assay. Include reference to measures taken to ensuresample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Samples were air dried on elevated grid mesh until practical to transport Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, suchas where there is coarse gold that has inherentsampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Nominal small drill sample was collected for chip tray and sandwich-sized ziplock bags Claystone hosted lithium deposits are thought to form as a result of the weathering of lithium-bearing volcanic glass within tertiary-aged tuffaceous lacustrine sediments of the mapped Ts3 unit. Inputs of lithium from geothermal sources have also been proposed. Drilling techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, openholehammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core isoriented and if so, by what method, etc). 5.5” reverse circulation and 5.25” tricone drilling methods employed. Water was injected to assist with transport ofsample from bit to surface, as required. Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core andchip sample recoveries and results assessed. Sample recovery established by dry sample weights undertaken by independent laboratory prior to sample preparation and analysis Measures taken to maximise sample recoveryand ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gainof fine/coarse material. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to alevel of detail to support appropriate MineralResource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative innature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. Challenging ground conditions arising from the drilling of quaternary alluvial and soft claystones did result in poor recovery in some instances. Instances of poor recovery are not expected tomaterially impact interpretation of results Drill cuttings for entire hole logged for lithology by company geologists Logging is qualitative Photography of material intersections of claystone taken of relevant chip trays See Appendix 2 for summary lithology logging The total length and percentage of the relevantintersections logged. Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Subsampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. Samples, 50% split using a rotary cone splitter, were submitted to ALS Laboratories in Reno for preparation and analysis. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotarysplit, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparationtechnique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivityof samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling isrepresentative of the in situ material collected,including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests Whether sample sizes are appropriate to thegrain size of the material being sampled. The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial ortotal. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheldXRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precisionhave been established. Verification of sampling and assaying Assay quality was monitored using pulp blanks, as well as certified reference materials (CRMs) at a range of lithium grades. Pulp blank results indicated no material contamination of samples from sample preparation or during the analytical process. CRM results were within 3 standard deviations of certified values. No material systematic bias nor other accuracy related issues were identified. The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. Sample intervals to be assigned a unique sample identification number prior to sample despatch The use of twinned holes. Lithium-mineralised claystone Certified Reference Materials (standards), pulp blanks and coarse blanks to be inserted into the sample stream at regular intervals to monitor lab accuracy and potential contamination during sample prep and analytical processes Documentation of primary data, data entryprocedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Location of data points Samples analysed by method ME-MS41 which is an ICP-MS method employing an aqua-regia digest. Aqua-regia is not considered a ‘total’ digest for many elements however is considered fit for purpose for lithium and has been used extensively by other parties exploring for lithium claystone deposits in the USA. Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locatedrill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Drill collar locations determined using handheld GPS with location reported in NAD83 UTM Zone 11. Expected hole location accuracy of +/10m No downhole surveys conducted on vertical holes Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Drill spacing is appropriate for early exploration purposes Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the MineralResource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. 5-foot sample interval widely adopted as standard practice in air drilling in the USA. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. Claystone beds are regionally sub-horizontal withshallow dip of <5° although locally this may vary Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. Samples picked up from the Company’s yard in Tonopah by ALS Laboratories for direct delivery to Reno laboratory Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of samplingtechniques and data. Not applicable If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com APPENDIX 1 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Section 2 - Reporting of Exploration Results Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. Altair Claims held in 100% Astute subsidiary Needles Holdings Inc. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration byother parties. Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Claims located on Federal (BLM) Land Drilling conducted on claims certified by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) No known previous lithium exploration conducted on Altair. Exploration conducted in the region by other explorers referenced in announcement body text The principal target deposit style is claystone hosted lithium mineralisation. Claystone hosted lithium deposits are thought to form as a result of the weathering of lithium-bearing volcanic glass within tertiary-aged tuffaceous lacustrine sediments of the mapped Ts3 unit. Lacustrine environments formed as a result of extensional tectonic regime that produced ‘basin and range’ topography observed across the stateof Nevada. Inputs of lithium from geothermal sources have also been proposed. Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: ◦ easting and northing of the drill hole collar ◦ elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar ◦ dip and azimuth of the hole ◦ down hole length and interception depth ◦ hole length. Drillhole locations and drilled depths are tabulated in body report All holes drilled vertically If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Intersections, where quoted are weighted by length. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shownin detail. No cut-off has been employed where the full intersection of prospective lithology (i.e. Siebert formation). The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. A 300ppm Li cut-off was used to quote headline intersections, with allowance for 5ft of internal dilution by lower grade material. Spot grades also quoted for single drill sample intervals where anomalous Sample assays from overlying alluvium were excluded from all quoted intersections. Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. Insufficient information available due to early exploration status If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) andtabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Included in ASX announcement Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. This release describes all relevant information Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysicalsurvey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. This release describes all relevant information Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (egtests for lateral extensions or depth extensions orlarge-scale step-out drilling). Drill results demonstrate further work at the Altair project is warranted. Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com APPENDIX 2 – Altair Drilling Summary Lithology Logging From To (ft) (ft) AL02 0 AL02 AL02 Hole ID Rock Formation Summary Lithology Comments 55 Unconsolidated Polymictic coarse grained 55 75 Unknown Gravel - fine Polymictic fine grained 75 85 Unknown Claystone Puggy AL02 85 100 Unknown Gravel - fine Polymictic fine grained AL02 100 105 Unknown Mixed clay-gravel AL02 105 120 Unknown Gravel - fine AL02 120 130 Unknown Mixed clay-gravel AL02 130 135 Unknown Gravel - fine AL02 135 150 Unknown Mixed clay-gravel AL02 150 155 Unknown Gravel - fine AL02 155 160 Unknown Mixed clay-gravel AL02 160 210 Unknown Gravel - fine Polymictic fine grained AL02 210 250 Unknown Claystone Hard. Minor gravel in part AL02 250 265 Unknown Gravel - fine Polymictic fine grained AL02 265 270 Unknown Claystone Hard light brown green claystone AL02 270 330 Unknown Gravel - fine Polymictic fine grained AL02 330 345 Unknown Claystone Hard light brown green claystone AL02 345 365 Unknown Claystone Hard AL02 365 370 Unknown Claystone Puggy clay AL02 370 415 Unknown Gravel - fine Polymictic fine grained AL02 415 420 Unknown Claystone Hard light brown green claystone AL02 420 425 Unknown Mixed clay-gravel AL02 425 430 Unknown Claystone AL02 430 435 Unknown Mixed clay-gravel AL02 435 445 Unknown Gravel - fine Gravel med-coarse Gravelly Polymictic fine grained Gravelly in part Polymictic fine grained Gravelly in part Polymictic fine grained Gravelly in part Gravel with same claystone as prior interval Hard light brown green claystone Gravel with same claystone as prior interval Polymictic fine grained AL03 0 45 Unconsolidated Gravel med-coarse Polymictic coarse grained AL03 45 140 Unconsolidated Gravel med-coarse Polymictic medium grained Gravel med-coarse Polymictic coarse grained AL03 140 240 Unconsolidated AL03 240 460 Unknown Gravel - fine AL03 460 465 Unknown Mixed clay-gravel AL03 465 505 Unknown Gravel - fine AL03 AL03 505 525 525 560 Siebert Siebert Mixed clay-gravel Claystone Blue-green-grey clay with fine gravel Blue-green-grey to creamy grey claystone AL03 560 580 Siebert Mixed clay-gravel Blue-green-grey clay with fine gravel Pebbly, rounded to angular and polymictic Polymictic fine grained Orange-brown puggy clay with minor gravel Polymictic fine grained AL01 0 225 Unconsolidated Gravel med-coarse AL01 225 235 Unconsolidated Gravel - fine AL01 235 275 Siebert Mixed clay-gravel Variable light orange brown clay content AL01 275 370 Siebert Claystone Tan to light olive to Bluey green claystone AL01 370 385 Siebert Mixed clay-gravel AL01 385 395 Siebert Claystone AL01 395 405 Siebert Mixed clay-gravel AL01 405 445 Siebert Claystone AL01 445 475 Siebert Mixed clay-gravel AL01 475 595 Siebert Claystone Rounded to angular and polymictic Bluey green claystone in part Bluey green claystone Bluey green claystone in part Bluey green claystone Bluey green claystone in part Blue-green to Dark grey green claystone Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com APPENDIX 3 – Altair Drilling Sample Assay Table Sample ID Hole ID From (ft) To (ft) Li (ppm) Sample ID Hole ID From (ft) To (ft) Li (ppm) 701701 AL02 0 5 21.7 701748 AL02 225 230 43.8 701702 AL02 5 10 20.8 701749 AL02 230 235 42 701703 AL02 10 15 23.3 701750 AL02 235 240 39.1 701704 AL02 15 20 22.1 701751 AL02 240 245 49.3 701705 AL02 20 25 21.7 701752 AL02 245 250 67.3 701706 AL02 25 30 24 701753 AL02 250 255 32.4 701707 AL02 30 35 19.7 701754 AL02 255 260 20.1 701708 AL02 35 40 19.5 701755 AL02 260 265 38.9 701709 AL02 40 45 29.1 701756 AL02 265 270 41.5 701710 AL02 45 50 20.6 701757 AL02 270 275 20.9 701711 AL02 50 55 14.9 701758 AL02 275 280 19.4 701712 AL02 55 60 24.5 701759 AL02 280 285 29.4 701713 AL02 60 65 22.1 701760 AL02 285 290 31.5 701714 AL02 65 70 20.9 701761 AL02 290 295 24.7 701715 AL02 70 75 26.4 701763 AL02 295 300 26.1 701716 AL02 75 80 72.2 701764 AL02 300 305 26.8 701717 AL02 80 85 131.5 701765 AL02 305 310 37.8 701718 AL02 85 90 92.6 701766 AL02 310 315 34.8 701719 AL02 90 95 42 701767 AL02 315 320 41.8 701721 AL02 95 100 24.7 701768 AL02 320 325 28.3 701722 AL02 100 105 77.7 701769 AL02 325 330 53.5 701723 AL02 105 110 46.8 701770 AL02 330 335 47.6 701724 AL02 110 115 19 701771 AL02 335 340 58.7 701725 AL02 115 120 27.7 701772 AL02 340 345 56 701726 AL02 120 125 93.9 701773 AL02 345 350 67 701727 AL02 125 130 125 701774 AL02 350 355 88.2 701728 AL02 130 135 74.8 701775 AL02 355 360 148.5 701729 AL02 135 140 96 701776 AL02 360 365 99.5 701730 AL02 140 145 59.7 701777 AL02 365 370 84.7 701731 AL02 145 150 67.1 701778 AL02 370 375 42.4 701732 AL02 150 155 49.3 701779 AL02 375 380 22.9 701733 AL02 155 160 77.2 701780 AL02 380 385 25.7 701734 AL02 160 165 70 701781 AL02 385 390 30.2 701735 AL02 165 170 31.2 701782 AL02 390 395 24.6 701736 AL02 170 175 28.8 701784 AL02 395 400 29.1 701737 AL02 175 180 40.1 701785 AL02 400 405 32.1 701738 AL02 180 185 41.5 701787 AL02 410 415 22 701739 AL02 185 190 53.8 701788 AL02 415 420 52.3 701740 AL02 190 195 76 701789 AL02 420 425 69.5 701742 AL02 195 200 76.3 701790 AL02 425 430 71.7 701743 AL02 200 205 30.6 701791 AL02 430 435 109 701744 AL02 205 210 22.8 701792 AL02 435 440 58.1 701745 AL02 210 215 43.9 701793 AL02 440 445 58 701746 AL02 215 220 38.2 701747 AL02 220 225 39 Suite 6, Level 5, 189 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 | GPO Box 2733, Sydney NSW 2001 +61 (0) 2 8046 2799 | admin@astutemetals.com www.astutemetals.com APPENDIX 3 – Altair Drilling Sample Assay Table Sample Hole From To Li Sample Hole From To Li ID ID (ft) (ft) (ppm) ID ID (ft) (ft) (ppm) 701532 AL03 150 155 24 701579 AL03 375 380 28.7 701533 AL03 155 160 45.9 701580 AL03 380 385 27.5 701534 AL03 160 165 34.2 701581 AL03 385 390 26.9 701535 AL03 165 170 30.9 701582 AL03 390 395 30.7 701536 AL03 170 175 29.5 701584 AL03 39